THE MANAGER v. CHANDRU S
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.5650/2019(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3303/2024) BETWEEN THE MANAGER SHRIRAM GIC LTD NO.302, 3RD FLOOR S & S CORNER BUILDING FLAT NO.48, HOSPITAL ROAD (OPP BOWRING AND LADY CURZON HOSPITAL) SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 560001 NOW REP BY THE BRANCH MANAGER SHRIRAM GIC LTD NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S V ARCADE BELEKALHALLI MAIN ROAD OPP. BANNERGHATTA ROAD LIMB POST, BANGALORE-76 (BY SRI PRADEEP B, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANT 2 AND 1 . CHANDRU S BIN CHINNAPPA @ CHANDRAPPA AGED AOBUT 54 YEARS BITTAGODANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN – 580726 2 . MALLESH GOWDA P M DIN MALLEGOWDA , PERUMANAHALLI VILLAGE HANUMANTHPURA POST HASSAN - 580706 …..RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03.05.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.665/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT, HASSAN AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel 3 for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.