M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL v. SMT. GEETHA BAI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.4427/2020(ECA) (Lok Adalat No.2274/2024) BETWEEN M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. NO.4/5, 3RD FLOOR, S V ARCADE BILAKAHALLI MAIN ROAD OFF BG ROAD, IIM POST BANGALORE-560 076 NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (BY SRI B C SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANT AND 1 . SMT. GEETHA BAI W/O LATE NARAYANA NAYKA @ NARAYANASWAMY NAYKA NOW AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 2 . MANJUNATHA N S/O LATE NARAYANA NAYKA @ NARAYANASWAMY NAYKA NOW AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 2 3 . RENUKA N D/O LATE NARAYANA NAYKA @ NARAYANASWAMY NAYKA NOW AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS SINCE PETITIONER NOS.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER SMT GEETHA BAI, 1ST PETITIONER AS A NATURAL GUARDIAN ALL ARE R/AT 35TH CROSS MAIN ROAD, J P NAGAR MALLATHAHALLI, PAALANJOGIHALLI BANGALORE RURAL DIST. 4 . SRI MUNIYAPPA N M S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA R/AT NO.11, NAGASHETTIHALLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST. 5 . SRI NATARAJ NAIK S/O LATE LAKSHMAN NAIK R/AT KELAGINANAYAKARANDALLI TUBAGERE HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST. (R4 IS SERVED) …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF THE EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.04.2019 PASSED IN ECA NO.39/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDITIONAL SCJ AND MACT, BENGALURU SCCH-17, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.7,47,600/- WITH INTEREST AT 12 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF ACCIDENT TILL ITS REALIZATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.