✦ Karnataka High Court

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE v. SRI MANJUNATHA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.3904/2024(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3298/2024) BETWEEN SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED UDUPI BRANCH, UDUPI. THROUGH ITS REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.4/5, 3RD FLOOR, S.V.ARCADE, BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD, IIM POST, OPPOSITE B.G.ROAD, BENGALURU 560 076, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. (BY SRI ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANT AND 1 . SRI MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O NONAIAH NAIKA, OCC: DRIVER, RESIDENT OF AZAD NAGAR, 2 KOTTIGEHARA, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577113. 2 . SRI RAVIPRASAD NAIK, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O BABURAYA NAIK, RESIDING AT NO.3-99, HOLEBIDI GUDDABE MOODUBELLE, UDUPI. (OWNER OF LORRY NO.KA-20/A-9019) (BY SRI SAGAR V SHASTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED) …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.03.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.449/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.7,76,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments