THE MANAGER v. NAGARAJU @ NAGARAJANAYAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.3421/2024(MV) (Lok Adalat No.2283/2024) BETWEEN THE MANAGER THE SHRIRAM GENERAL INS. CO. LTD., NO.S/5, 2ND FLOOR, MUNRISH CHAMBERS INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE, NOW WILL BE REPRESENTED BY SHRIRAM GIC LTD., NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S V ARCADE BELEKALHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP. BANNERGHATTA ROAD IIMB POST, BANGALORE-76 (BY SRI PRADEEP B, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . NAGARAJU @ NAGARAJANAYAKA S/O SIDDANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT HARADANAHALLI VILLAGE CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK ...APPELLANT 2 PRESENTLY R/AT C/O SWAMY S/O SIDDASHETTY BHEEMANABEEDU VILLAGE GUNDLUPET TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT 2 . KRISHNA S/O BASAVASHETTY UPPARA STREET NEW EXTENSION, DODDAMOLE VILLAGE, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.05.03.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.236/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.6,70,500/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF REALIZATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.