M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. VASUDEVACHAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1725/2021(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3500/2024) BETWEEN M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, E/8, EPIP SEETHAPUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, JAYAPURA, RAJASTHAN-302022. NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S.V.ARCADE BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP TO BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, IIM POST, BANGALORE 76 REPTD. BY ITS ASST. MANAGER (BY SRI B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND ...APPELLANT VASUDEVACHAR S/O LATE TIPPACHAR, SINCE DEAD DURING PENDENCY OF CLAIM PETITION AND HENCE REP. BY LRS, 2 1 . T.R. VEDAMURTHI, S/O LATE VASUDEVACHAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT LAKHMIPURA EXTENSION, ARASIKERE. 2 . VENUGOPAL S/O RAVINDRA, C/O RANGANATH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, GOVINDAPURA PUMP HOUSE, NORTH SIDE, TIPTUR TOWN, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT. 3 . NAVEEN KUMAR MAJOR, S/O MELUGIRIYAPPA, NO.1740, CHURCH ROAD, WARD NO.6, ARASIKERE TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT. (R3 IS SERVED) …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.03.09.2019 IN MVC NO.1772/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT, ARSIKERE, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.3,16,399/- WITH INTEREST AT 9 PER CENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION AND ETC. PASSED THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.