SRI PARAMESH v. THEJESWINI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 s. 71
- Karnataka Land Revenue Act s. 49(c)
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 8785 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI PARAMESH V AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O.LATE VENKATESH BELATHUR COLONY KADUGODI POST BENGALURU- 560 067. MOB- [REDACTED]. (BY SRI. DHARMAPALA GOWDA A., ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT BY CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE- 560001.
THE PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE- 560001.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER. BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, DC OFFICE BUILDING, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA., K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 009. - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:17609 WP No. 8785 of 2026 HC-KAR
THE TAHASILDAR. BENGALURU EAST TALUK, DESEL SHED ROAD, KR PURAM, BENGALURU- 560036.
M/S STERLING URBAN CONDOMINIUMS PVT LTD REPT BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.GOPALAN NO.19, THE FALCON TOWERS BRUNTON ROAD, BANGALORE- 560025.
M/S PRESTIGE GROUP PRESTIGE FALCON TOWERS, NO. 19. BRUNTON ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 025. REPT BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MR. ZAID SADIQ, MAJOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND PASS AN ORDER OR DIRECTION DECLARING THAT THE ORDER DATED 29.09.2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO. 3. PURPORTEDLY UNDER SECTION 28A OF THE KARNATAKA LAND GRANT RULES, 1969, SEEKING TO REALIGN THE PATHWAY, IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, AND LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE, AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE SAME, WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A., AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:17609 WP No. 8785 of 2026 HC-KAR THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned AGA takes notice for respondents No. 1 to 4.
2. Notice to respondents No. 5 and 6 is not necessary for the following reasons.
3. Learned AGA raises a preliminary objection that the order impugned is passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 71 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and therefore, it is an original order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, where provision is made under Section 49(c) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act for an appeal to be filed before the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal. - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:17609 WP No. 8785 of 2026 HC-KAR
Operative part
4. Upholding the submissions of the learned AGA the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the tribunal. Office return certified copies/original documents to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — s. 71; Karnataka Land Revenue Act — s. 49(c).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.