THE MANAGER v. SMT. NARAYANAMMA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.1277/2024(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3296/2024) BETWEEN THE MANAGER THE SHRIRAM GENERAL INS. CO.LTD., NO.5, 2ND FLOOR, MONARCH CHAMBERS, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 NOW WILL BE REPRESENTED BY SHRIRAM GIC LTD., NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S.V.ARCADE, BELEKALHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP. BANNERGHATTA ROAD, IIMB POST, BANGALORE-76 (BY SRI PRADEEP B, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SMT. NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, ...APPELLANT 2 R/AT SHIVAPURA VILLAGE, CHALDIGANAHALLI POST, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. 2 . SMT. MANJULA W/O NARAYANAPPA, MAJOR, R/AT GUNNAHALLI VILLAGE, TALAGAVARA POST, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N.GOPAL KRISHNA N, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 - SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.08.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.4621/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, XVIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU CITY (SCCH-4), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.15,07,294/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE REALIZATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.