M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.5/4, 3 v. MADHUSHREE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.685/2024(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3637/2024) BETWEEN M/S SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NO.5/4, 3RD FLOOR, S V ARCADE BELEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD, BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE-560076 REPTD. BY ITS ASST. MANAGER (BY SRI B.C.SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . MADHUSHREE D/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT 32/30, GANESHA TEMPLE ROAD CHOLARAPALYA, MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU-560023 2 . SRI S. MOSHIN ALI S/O SAJAD ALI AGED MAJOR NO.114, POTHENAHALLI, ...APPELLANT 2 GOURIBIDANUU TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA-561213 …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.04.12.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.1424/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES AND ACMM AND ADDITIONAL MACT, BENGALURU, (SCCH-15), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.30,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT OF AWARD AMOUNT AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. SN Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.