✦ Karnataka High Court

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SRI N. BHASKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. SRI N. BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O K V JAYASHANKAR, NO.29, YALLAPPA BUILDING, 18TH ‘B’ CROSS, GAYATHRI LAYOUT, BASAVANAPURA MAIN ROAD, K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560036. ...APPELLANT 2 PERMANENT ADDRESS: EDDULAPALLI VILLAGE, KENAMUKULAPALLI, SANTHIPURAM, KUPPAM TALUK, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517423. 2 . SRI VENUGOPAL NAIDU VUPPALLAPAATI…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & SMT. P.V. KALPANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.536/2024(MV) (Lok Adalat No.3297/2024) BETWEEN SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.4/5, 3RD FLOOR, S V ARCADE, BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPPOSITE B G ROAD, IIM POST, BENGALURU-560076, REP. BY ITS MANAGER (BY SRI ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATE) AND

#1. SRI N. BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O K V JAYASHANKAR, NO.29, YALLAPPA BUILDING, 18TH ‘B’ CROSS, GAYATHRI LAYOUT, BASAVANAPURA MAIN ROAD, K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560036. ...APPELLANT 2 PERMANENT ADDRESS: EDDULAPALLI VILLAGE, KENAMUKULAPALLI, SANTHIPURAM, KUPPAM TALUK, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517423. 2 . SRI VENUGOPAL NAIDU VUPPALLAPAATI MAJOR IN AGE, S/O SRI GURUSWAMY NAIDU, RESIDENT OF MURAKAMBATTU, CHITTOOR MANDAL, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517127, (R C OWNER OF TRACTOR TRAILER NO.AP-03/TC-0041/0042) …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.13.04.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.3822/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XXI ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, (SCCH-23), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.7,91,000/- WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF CLAIM PETITION TILL REALIZATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed and also prayed that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. In view of the said memo, the learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be transmitted to the Tribunal. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SN

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments