SRI. V. MUNIYAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 1329 OF 2016 (LA-HS) BETWEEN:
SRI. V. MUNIYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1(a) SRI. MUTHURAJ S/O LATE V. MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.46/A, 8TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 078 1(b) SRI. JAYARAJU M., S/O LATE V. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.46/B, 8TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, J.P. NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 078
SMT. SUSHEELA W/O SRI KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS JARAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 078 (BY SRI. H.V. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27912 WP No. 1329 of 2016 HC-KAR AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009
THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009
THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 002 (BY SMT. CHANDINI SINGH, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3; SMT. SUMANGALA SIMIMATH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR ALL CONNECTED RECORDS RELATING TO ANNEXURE-V; ORDER, DATED 21.09.2015 PASSED IN CASE NO. RHS 279/1985-86 AND QUASH ANNEXURE-V; THE ORDER, DATED 21.09.2015 PASSED IN CASE NO. RHS 279/1985086 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27912 WP No. 1329 of 2016 HC-KAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed.
2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, this writ is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.