SMT. REVATHI RAJASHEKARAN v. THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK LTD., NO.1, PAMAPAMAHAKAVI ROAD
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. THE SECRETARY, THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK LTD., NO.1, PAMAPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018 (BY SRI. A. ABHINAV RAMANAND, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15488 WP No. 83 of 2016 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND…
Judgment
SMT. REVATHI RAJASHEKARAN W/O J. RAJASHEKARAN, AGED 65 YEARS, NO.77, ORBORNE ROAD, BANGALORE-560042 (BY SRI. K.V. NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: …PETITIONER
THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK LTD., NO.1, PAMAPAMAHAKAVI ROAD CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018, BY ITS PRESIDENT Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK LTD., NO.1, PAMAPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018
Operative part
THE SECRETARY, THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK LTD., NO.1, PAMAPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560018 (BY SRI. A. ABHINAV RAMANAND, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3) …RESPONDENTS - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15488 WP No. 83 of 2016 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CLAUSE INTERPRETATION (f), APPLICATION OF THE SCHEME 1[b] AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SCHEME [1] OF NOTIFICATION AT ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired and he has not received any instructions from the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner to pursue this petition. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed as having abated. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.