AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Sr. No.64 WP(C) No.1789/2021 Dr. Narinder Singh Jaggi & Ors. v. Hemant Yashwant Dhage; 2016 (6) SCC & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
as such, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No
Judgment
Operative part
Through: Mr. Imran Ahmed Rather, Adv. Vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sanchit Verma, Assisting counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER Despite numerous opportunities, response has not been filed by the respondents. No purpose would be served by retaining this writ petition on board, as such, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to ensure conclusion of the investigation as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from today and in the event of non-compliance, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the CJM concerned in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe Vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and ors.; 2016 (6) SCC 277. Disposed of. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 28.04.2022 Eva
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.