✦ Orissa High Court

State of Odisha & Ors. v. (Through hybrid Mode)

ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 21 of 2026SAVITRI RATHO

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dash, Advocate State of Odisha and others -versus- ….. Opposite Parties Mr. Raj Bhusan Dash, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 30.01.2026 (Through hybrid Mode) Order No. 02.

1.

This Court has not satisfied with the instructions dated

13.01.2026 on 22.01.2026, this Court had called for the case diary in Kudanagari Police Station of District Kendrapara. Perusal of the case diary reveals that there are no entries after 10.11.2025 in the case diary. On the said date, the IIC has verified the Criminal antecedents of Deepak Kumar Routray and Bhagyalaxmi Routray, which are available in the PS record/ CCTNS and found that they are involved in Kudanagari PS Case No. 300 dated 31.10.2025 under Section 420/294/506 of the IPC. In instruction dated 13.01.206 it had been indicated that as per order passed by this Court in ABLAPL No. 2015/2025 the accused Deepak Kumar Routray and Bhagyalaxmi Routray have been released on bail on their surrender in the Court of the learned SDJM, Kendrapara on 02.06.2025.

2.

As this Court normally does not monitor the investigation or interfere with the investigation by the police and alternative remedy is available to the petitioner, the CRLMP is disposed with the expectation that the investigation will be completed expeditiously and granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy which is available to her as per the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and Others reported in 2016 (6) SCC 277. Subhalaxmi (Savitri Ratho) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 30-Jan-2026 17:17:07

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 21 of 2026). ← Search more judgments