LADAKH AT SRINAGAR SWP No. 957 of 2010 · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
Judgment
O R D E R 18.05.2022 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case on last several dates which suggests that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter any further. Dismissed for want of prosecution along with connected CM(s). Interim direction, if any, shall also stand vacated. Srinagar 18.05.2022 “Abdul Rashid” (M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. LADAKH AT SRINAGAR SWP No. 957 of 2010).
← Search more judgments