✦ High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

None v. State of J&K & Ors.

SWP No. 1924 of 2014M A CHOWDHARY

Case at a glance

Bench: M A CHOWDHARY

Judgment

Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. .…. Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER (15.09.2025)

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So was the case on the last date of hearing, which suggests that the petitioners have lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.

02.

Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).

03.

Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU 15.09.2025 Bunty Bunty Kumar 2025.09.17 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh or eCourts case status (search case no. SWP No. 1924 of 2014). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching