✦ Jharkhand High Court

Sk. Samzad @ Sk. Saddam @ Sk. Samzed v. The State of Jharkhand

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 13972 of 2023RAJESH KUMAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The present bail application stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. The present bail application stands disposed of. Amar/- (Rajesh Kumar, J.)

Judgment

---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) For the State For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Manoj Kr. Dash, Adv. : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Adv. 04/Dated: 13th July, 2023 ----

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.

2.

The applicant who is in custody since 16.08.2022 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Dhalbhumgarh P.S. Case No.51 of 2020 corresponding with G.R. No.189 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Ghatshila.

3.

It appears that provisional bail for four months has been granted to the applicant vide order dated 28.03.2023 and the matter had been referred for the conciliation. The conciliation report has been submitted and from perusal of the same it appears that the conciliation was successful and both the parties have compromised and have agreed to resume their matrimonial life.

4.

Considering the conciliation report, the provisional bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 28.03.2023, is hereby confirmed.

5.

The applicant is directed to file fresh bail bond within six weeks from today.

Operative part

6.

The present bail application stands disposed of. Amar/- (Rajesh Kumar, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The present bail application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 498A.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 13972 of 2023). ← Search more judgments