Vikash Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 395, 456, 457, 458
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the period of custody and the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on…
Judgment
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) For the State : Ms. Anshu Kumari, Adv. : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. 05/Dated: 31st August, 2024 ----
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. The applicant, who is in custody since 11.05.2024, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Pratappur P.S. Case No.56 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 395, 456, 457, 458 & 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chatra.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the applicant has been roped in the present case only due to village politics. Further, it has been submitted that the applicant is a daily wages worker and he has no criminal antecedent. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the period of custody and the materials available on record, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in connection with Pratappur P.S. Case No.56 of 2024, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. Raja/- Uploaded (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.