Pintu Bhuiyan v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 306
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) For the State : Mr. S.K. Singh, Adv. : Mr. A. Sen, A.P.P. --- --- 03/30.01.2023: Heard the parties. --- The applicant-husband, who is in custody since 24.06.2022, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail. The applicant is an accused of assaulting and murdering his wife. It has been submitted by the counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. Innocence has been claimed and participation in the trial has been assured. It has been submitted that the police has submitted charge sheet under Section 306 IPC and except hanging, no injury has been found. Charge has already been framed. On the above facts, prayer for bail has been made. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant (s) on bail. Accordingly, the applicant(s), above named, is/are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Palamau, in connection with S.T. No.559 of 2022 on the condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy of his/her/their Aadhaar Card and also submit his/her/their mobile number before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. Ravi/- (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.