Bahadur Sao v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Outcome
Withdrawn
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7440 of 2025 ---- 1. Bahadur Sao aged about 50 years son of Babulal Sao resident of Village and PO Lokai PS and Dist. Koderma 2. Bhagwan Das @ Bhagwan Das Sahu, aged about 70 years son of Late Koshi Sao, resident of Village and PO Lokai PS and District Koderma 3. Mitlal Yadav @ Manikant Yadav, aged about 57 years son of Bishun Yadav, resident of Village Banshgharwa and PO Indarwa and PS and District Koderma 4. Sahdeo Yadav aged about 53 years son of Gajo Yadav, resident of Village Jalwabad, PO Jalwabad PS and Dist. Koderma 5. Santosh Yadav, aged about 53 years son of Ganesh Yadav, resident of Village Inderwa, PO Lokai, PS Telaiya, District Koderma 6. Shyam Sunder Yadav @ Shyam Yadav, aged about 50 years son of Lalkishun Choudhary resident of Village Inderwa, PO Lokai, PS Telaiya, Dist. Koderma -- Versus -- .... Petitioners The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners For the State --- :- Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ---- 2/12.02.2026 This matter relates to Complaint Case No.2203 of 2023 and the case is pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
After some argument, learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw instant petition with liberty to move before learned court on strength of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
Learned counsel for respondent State has got no objection for same.
Operative part
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
12.02.2026 SI/ ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.