Miya @ Danish Khalipha Tahir Miyan Alias Tahir Nut Vill.- Kurum Tola v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 and & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 341, 342, 354B, 447, 504
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 s. 8
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2023 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Danish Miya @ Danish Khalipha Tahir Miyan Alias Tahir Nut Vill.- Kurum Tola, P.S.- Sagauli, Dist.- E. Champaran. The State of Bihar Vill.- Kurum Tola, P.S.- Sagauli, Dist.- E. Champaran. Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh Mr.Amitesh Kumar Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
#2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 260 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 341, 342, 323, 354B, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act.
#3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
#4. Permission is granted.
#5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
#6. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2690 of 2024(4) dt.16-04-2024 learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel below is also directed to consider the Apex Court judgment in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 and in the case Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. devendra/- U T (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 341, 342, 354B, 447, 504; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — s. 8.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.