Motassim Javed v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
In view of above facts, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Learned counsel for the State has got no objection. In view of above facts, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Dt. 13.04.2026 satyarthi- ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Advocate :Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Advocate ------ 04/ 13.04.2026: The matter relates to Seraikella P.S. Case No. 30 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Seraikella.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to move before the learned court on the strength of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
Operative part
Learned counsel for the State has got no objection. In view of above facts, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Dt. 13.04.2026 satyarthi- ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.