Dilshad Ansari v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 376(2)(n)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. Considering the fact that both the parties are major, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond…
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner For the State 04/14.12.2023 : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Adv. : Ms. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. ....
The applicant who is in custody since 07.06.2023 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Puso P.S. Case No.11 of 2023, registered for the offence under Section 376(2)(n) of IPC.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that both the parties are major and the alleged victim is a married lady. The allegation of false pretext of marriage is falsified. Even if the allegation is accepted then the relationship was consensual. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. Considering the fact that both the parties are major, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Gumla in connection with Puso P.S. Case No.11 of 2023 subject to condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. Shahid/ uploaded (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.