Vijaya Lakshmi v. The State of Jharkhand
Judgment
-- Versus – 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Sunil Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, son of not known to the petitioner, Chief Engineer, Central Design Organization, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Artisan Hostel, Ground Floor, Block-A PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand ….Respondent/Opposite Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binit Chandra, Advocate ---- 11/18.10.2024 Learned counsels for the petitioner as well respondent- …………… State jointly submit that writ court order has been complied with.
In view of such submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the contempt proceeding is dropped.
3. The Contempt Case is disposed of. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. Satyarthi ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J) 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.