Safakat Ali @ Safakat @ Shafakat v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 399, 402
- Arms Act, 1959
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant is hereby, rejected ‘at this stage’. Raja/- Uploaded (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Judgment
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) For the State : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Adv. : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. 02/Dated: 23rd October, 2024 ----
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. The applicant, who is in custody since 30.06.2024, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.71 of 2024, registered for the offence under Section 399, 402, 120B of the Indian Penal Code & Section 25(-1B)a/25(6)/26 & 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Jamtara.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the recovery has been made from the vehicle, not from this applicant. This applicant has no criminal antecedent. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant is hereby, rejected ‘at this stage’. Raja/- Uploaded (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.