Shamshad Ansari @ Pansi v. The State of Jharkhand
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the above fact, I am inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail. Accordingly, the applicants are directed to be released on bail, on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioners For the State --------- : Mr. Gautam Kr. Pandey, Advocate : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P --------- 04/Dated: 28 th April, 2023
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. The applicants, who are in custody since 16.09.2022, have approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Korra P.S. Case No.211 of 2022.
It appears that these applicants have been made accused for committing the offence under Sections 414/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the prayer for bail of the applicants was rejected by this Court vide order dated 18.01.2023, passed in B.A. No.12990 of
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that complete set of F.I.R along with its enclosures have been annexed with the present bail application and there is no suppression on his part. Innocence of the applicants has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that it could not be pointed out earlier that the registration of the alleged motor-cycle stands in the name of applicant No.02. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the above fact, I am inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail. Accordingly, the applicants are directed to be released on bail, on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, in connection with Korra P.S. Case No.211 of 2022, on the condition that the applicants will submit self-attested photocopy of their Aadhaar Card and also submit their mobile number before the learned court below which they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. Chandan/- (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.