✦ Allahabad High Court · 27 Aug 2024

Sakir v. State of U.P

CR.P.C No. 7636 of 2024KRISHAN PAHAL

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in…

Judgment

1.

Heard Ms. Sheeba Rizvi, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

2.

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.0250 of 2020, under Sections 308, 323 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali City, District Bijnor.

3.

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

4.

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

5.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

6.

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case. Order Date :- 27.8.2024 Ravi/- (Justice Krishan Pahal)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 308, 323, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 27 Aug 2024. The bench was KRISHAN PAHAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CR.P.C No. 7636 of 2024). ← Search more judgments