Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate & Ors. v. LAC shall remain stayed during pendency of the main appeal & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 99. Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion. The application stands disposed of.. August 26, 2026 (V.Himalvi) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
Judgment
Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 6(i) & 6(ii). CMP(M) No.1126 of 2026 As per report of the Registry, notice issued to respondents No.7(i) to 7(iv) & 8 to 14 received back duly served. However, there is no representation on their behalf, hence, they are proceeded against ex-parte.
#3. No reply is intended to be filed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of Er. Rattan Kumar Sharma, Superintending Engineer of the applicants- appellants, the same is allowed and the delay of 98 days’ in filing the appeal, which in my considered view has sufficiently been explained, is hereby condoned.
#4. The application stands disposed of. RFA No. of 2026 (RFAST No.39565/2026) Appeal be registered. Admit. Let post admission notice be issued to
#6. respondents No.7(i) to 7(iv) & 8 to 14, returnable within four weeks, on taking steps witihn a period of three days. List thereafter. CMP No.___ of 2026 (CMPST No.40280/2026) It be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire awarded
#8. amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of four weeks, the execution/operation of award dated 14.01.2026, passed by the learned Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (Additional District Judge), Nalagarh, District Mandi, H.P, in Land Acq. Case No.30-NL/4 of 2019(17), titled Durga & ors. Vs. LAC & ors. shall remain stayed during pendency of the main appeal.
#9. Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion. The application stands disposed of.. August 26, 2026 (V.Himalvi) ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Himachal Pradesh High Court, on 26 Aug 2026. The bench was SUSHIL KUKREJA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.