C. Krishna v. M Ramesh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 05.08.2026 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI…
Judgment
Cause title
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No. 177 of 2023 in O.S.No. 24 of 2015 on the file of the Honble II Additional District Judge at Madanapalle pending disposal of the above Appeal Suit in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay on the auction proceedings in E.P. NO. 177 of 2023 in O.S. No. 24 of 2015 on the file of Il nd Additional District Judge At Madanapalle, pending disposal of the Appeal Suit in the interest of justice and Counsel for the Petitioner: Annareddy Chandrasekhar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 33/2023
JUDGMENT:-
Heard Sri Annareddy Chandrasekhar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
It was represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the execution petition had filed by the respondents to execute the decree passed by the Trial Court and that the said Execution Petition was terminated by the Trial Court, as the appellant paid the decretal amount to the respondents, in view of the compromise arrived between both the parties.
Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, learned counsel appearing for the respondents also asserted the same. He further contends that the appeal suit has become infructuous.
Operative part
Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 05.08.2026 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO A.S. NO: 33/2023 Date: 05.08.2026 BSM
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 05 Aug 2026. The bench was VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.