Judgment · High Court
Judgment
W.P.(MD)No.31231 of 2025SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.The matter is listed upon being mentioned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a typographical error in paragraph No.1 of the order and that the correct survey number is 92/24 and not 94/24. Upon examining the records, the said contention is liable to be accepted. 2. The Registry is directed to reissue the order after replacing survey number 94/24 in line 2 of the first paragraph with survey number 92/24. 12.11.2025 RJR
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Madras High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments