✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Considering the reasons stated, the application is allowed as prayed for

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Considering the reasons stated, the application is allowed as prayed for. Therefore, the Registry is directed to receive the written statement of the defendants.04-03-2026(1/2)RNAA No. 1115 of 2026IN C.S(COMM DIV) NO. 238 OF 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1115 of 2026__________Page3 of 3

Judgment

A No. 1115 of 2026__________Page1 of 3IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYA No. 1115 of 2026IN C.S(COMM DIV) NO. 238 OF 20251.B JayamaniM 1074, 7th Main Road, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai2.M s Bharat Medical SystemsM 1074, 7th Main Road, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai..Applicant(s)VsM s HMS Medical Systems, Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr C DineshREP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR C DINESHA Registered Partnership FirmNO 9 FIRST CROSS STREET NEW COLONY PORUR CHENNAI-6000116..Respondent(s)PRAYER: To condone the delay of 85 days in filing this Written Statement in C.S.(Comm. Div) No.238 of 2025.For Applicant(s):Mr.Ramesh GanapathyFor Respondent(s):Ms.N.Devi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1115 of 2026__________Page2 of 3SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.RNAORDER Both the defendants have applied for condonation of the delay of 85 days in filing the written statement.

2.

In the affidavit in support of the application, the first applicant has stated that he was unwell and therefore could not coordinate with counsel. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has no serious objection to this application being allowed.

Operative part

3.

Considering the reasons stated, the application is allowed as prayed for. Therefore, the Registry is directed to receive the written statement of the defendants.04-03-2026(1/2)RNAA No. 1115 of 2026IN C.S(COMM DIV) NO. 238 OF 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1115 of 2026__________Page3 of 3

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments