Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1525 OF 2025BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 01.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN ANDTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMACONT.P.(MD)No.1525 of 2025 INW.P.(MD)No.2613 of 2025Athimoolam ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Thiru.V.P.Jeyaselan, IAS, District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 2. Thiru.R.Rajendran, District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Virudhunagar District. 3. Thiru. Sivakumar, Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 4. Tmt. Marreswari, Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Vambakottai, Virudhunagar District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1525 OF 20255. Tmt. Mageswari, Block Development Office(Village Panchayat), Vembakottai, Virudhunagar District. 6. Tmt. Porkodi, Village Administration Officer, Village Administration Office, Keelamarainadu, Alangulam, Virudhunagar District. ... Contemnors / RespondentsPrayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor / third respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 30.01.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.2613 of 2025 and punish them for contempt. For Petitioner : Ms.S.MeenaFor Respondents : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate. * * * O R D E R(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that pursuant to the order of this Court, eviction order was passed on 06.06.2025 and that the appeal was dismissed on 02.01.2026. The encroacher has now moved the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1525 OF 2025Commissioner of Land Administration. Since the order of this Court has been complied with, the petitioner has to necessarily abide by the outcome of the revision proceedings before the Commissioner of Land Administration. This contempt petition is closed.(G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (R.POORNIMA, J.) 1st April 2026 NCC : Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / NoPMUTo:1. The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Vambakottai, Virudhunagar District. 5. The Block Development Office(Village Panchayat), Vembakottai, Virudhunagar District. 6. The Village Administration Officer, Village Administration Office, Keelamarainadu, Alangulam, Virudhunagar District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 CONT.P.(MD)NO.1525 OF 2025G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ANDR.POORNIMA, J.PMUCONT.P.(MD)No.1525 Of 2025 INW.P.(MD)No.2613 of 202501.04.20264/4
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — s. 11.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 01 Apr 2026. The bench was G R SWAMINATHAN, R POORNIMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.