✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 02 Aug 2004

Contempt Case No. 224 of 2004 · Judicature Of Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004

Contempt Case No. 224 of 2004GODA RAGHURAM3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

To, Sri G.Sudheer, Prl Secretary to Govt of AP. Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. WHEREAS the Petitioner(s) herein have presented a petition to this court under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for committing the above named Respondent/s for Contempt of Court for deliberately and willfully disobeying W.P.M.P.No.25949 of 2003inW.P.No.20731of2003 dated.24-10-2003. this Hon’ble Court passed the orders of AND WHEREAS this court while dispensing with presence of Respondent hath this day directed issue of notice to the above named Respondent to show cause why, in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof (copies of which are annexed hereto) they should not be punished for contempt of court; Now : Therefore you namely ; Sri G.Sudheer, Prl Secretary to Govt of AP. Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause why in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not be punished for contempt of court. Sd/-P.VANA KUMARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To

1.

The Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (in duplicate along with copies of petition and affidavit for service on the sole Respondent and return before 26-04-2004)

2.

Sri G.Sudheer, Prl Secretary to Govt of AP. Higher Education Hyderabad. (By Department, Secretariat Buildings, Spl. Messenger along with a copy of Petition and Affidavit)

3.

one spare copy. JSW HIGH COURT GR J DATE 29-03-2004 NOTE: POST THIS CASE ON 26-04-2004 NOTICE CC NO.224 OF 2004 DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF RESPONDENT. DRAFTED BY JSW DRAFTED ON 16-04-2004 HIGH COURT GR J DATE 29-03-2004 NOTE: NOTICE CC NO.224 OF 2004 DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF RESPONDENT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND FOUR : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE : GODA RAGHURAM CONTEMPT CASE No.224 of 2004 To, Sri G.Sudheer, Prl Secretary to Govt of AP. Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. WHEREAS the Petitioner(s) herein have presented a petition to this court under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for committing the above named Respondent/s for Contempt of Court for deliberately and willfully disobeying W.P.M.P.No.25949 of 2003inW.P.No.20731of2003 dated.24-10-2003. this Hon’ble Court passed the orders of AND WHEREAS this court while dispensing with presence of Respondent hath this day directed issue of notice to the above named Respondent to show cause why, in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof (copies of which are annexed hereto) they should not be punished for contempt of court; Now : Therefore you namely ; Sri G.Sudheer, Prl Secretary to Govt of AP. Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause why in the circumstances stated in the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not be punished for contempt of court. Sd/-P.VANA KUMARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (in duplicate along with copies of petition and affidavit for service on the sole Respondent and return before 26-04-2004)

2. Sri G.Sudheer, Prl Secretary to Govt of AP. Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ( B y Spl. Messenger along with a copy of Petition and Affidavit)

3. one spare copy. JSW

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Aug 2004. The bench was GODA RAGHURAM.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Contempt Case No. 224 of 2004). ← Search more judgments