Smt. D. Jhansi Prakash v. The Commissioner of Appeals, O/o. the Chief Commissioner of Land & Administration
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
1. Smt. D. Jhansi Prakash 2. Miss. T. Mallika Petitioners AND
The Commissioner of Appeals, O/o. the Chief Commissioner of Land & Administration, Hyderabad
D. Aravind Kuma, District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District 3. The Assistant Collector, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District 4. Kasa Venkateswarlu S/o. Venugopal Naidu, Occ: Mandal Revenue Officer, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District (Respondents 1 and 3 are not necessary in this petition) Respondents FOR THE PETITIONER: MR. K. MANIKYALA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS: THE G.P. FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
The 4th respondent is present before this court. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue seeks time till Monday. The 2nd respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he is unable to attend this court today. His presence is dispensed with till Monday. The presence of the 4th respondent is dispensed with till further orders. Post on 10-11-2003.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR // true copy// SECTION OFFICER To
1. The Commissioner of Appeals, O/o. the Chief Commissioner of Land & Administration, Hyderabad (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER ALONG WITH A COPY OF PETITION & AFFIDAVIT)
2. Sri D. Aravind Kuma, District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District 3. The Assistant Collector, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District 4. Sri Kasa Venkateswarlu S/o. Venugopal Naidu, Occ: Mandal Revenue Officer, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District (ADDRESSEES 2 TO 4 BY SPEED POST ALONG WITH A COPY OF PETITION & AFFIDAVIT)
Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (SPECIAL MESSENGER ALONG WITH A COPY OF PETITION & AFFIDAVIT)
One Spare Copy MSR HIGH COURT DATE: 5-11-2003 ORDER C.C. No. 1102 of 2003 DRAFTED BY : MSR DRAFTED ON : 6.11.2003 HIGH COURT LNRJ DT. 5.11.2003 NOTE: POST ON 10-11-2003 ORDER C.C. No. 1102 of 2003
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 05 Nov 2003. The bench was L NARASIMHA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.