Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, and considering the fact that the respondent has no objection to the condonation of delay, we are inclined to allow the petition. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the…
Judgment
C.M.P(MD)No.2983 of 2026in W.A(MD)SR.No.18617 of 2026C.M.P(MD)No.2983 of 2026in W.A(MD)SR.No.18617 of 2026N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.andP.B.BALAJI , J.
O R D E R[Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.]This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 235 days in filing the above writ appeal.
Heard Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Aruncahalam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, and considering the fact that the respondent has no objection to the condonation of delay, we are inclined to allow the petition. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered.
Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the appeal “for admission” in the usual course. [N.S.K., J.] [P.B.B., J.] 15.04.2026ps1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD)No.2983 of 2026in W.A(MD)SR.No.18617 of 2026N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.andP.B.BALAJI , J. psC.M.P(MD)No.2983 of 2026inW.A(MD)SR.No.18617 of 202615.04.20262/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.