Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is accordingly, ordered. 09-12-2024dhk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.dhkCMP. 28092 of 2024inCRP.SR. 66594 OF 2024 09.12.2024
Judgment
CMP. 28092 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-12-2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMARCMP. 28092 of 2024inCRP.SR. 66594 OF 2024 T. BRINDAPETITIONER(S) VsS.JAYAKUMARRESPONDENT(S) For Petitioner(s): M/s.P.JAYALAKSHMIFor Respondent(s): Mr.P.M.DURAISWAMYORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 108 days in representing the above revision petition.
Heard the learned counsel for both sides. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in ordering this petition.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is accordingly, ordered. 09-12-2024dhk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.dhkCMP. 28092 of 2024inCRP.SR. 66594 OF 2024 09.12.2024
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.