✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

N SATHISH KUMAR, M JOTHIRAMAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 183 days in filing the appeal is condoned

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 183 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

Judgment

Crl.M.P.No.21604 of 2025&Crl.A (SR) No.88613 of 2025N.SATHISH KUMAR., J.andM.JOTHIRAMAN., J.(Order of the Court was made byN.SATHISH KUMAR.J.,)The petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 183 days in filing the above appeal against the order of conviction.

2.

Mr.A.Damodaran, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

Operative part

3.

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 183 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

4.

Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order.[N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 18.11.2025sli

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments