✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

P VELMURUGAN

Case at a glance

Bench
P VELMURUGAN

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cont.P.No.3950 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06.01.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGANandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMANCont.P.No.3950 of 20241. The Unemployed Sanitary and Health Inspectors Trained Graduates Welfare Association Reg.95/12 Rep. by the Secretary S.Gopinath No.92/A, Mariammal Koil Street Acharampattu, Irumbai Post Vanoor Taluk Villupuram District – 605 1112. G. Ravi.. PetitionersVs.

1.

Tmt. Supriya Sahu, I.A.S. The Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Secretariat, Chennai – 92. T.S.Selvavinayagam The Director Public Health & Preventive Medicine Chennai – 63. Dr. D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S The Principal Secretary Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department Secretariat, Chennai -9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3950 of 20244. Shri. Chandrakant B.Kamble, I.A.S. The Commissioner Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department Chepauk, Chennai -5 .. RespondentsPrayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for having wilfullly disobeyed the directions given by this Court order dated 09.07.2024 in Rev. Application No.40 of 2024 in W.A.No.1606 of 2014 and punish them under the relevant provisions of the Contempt of Court Act 1971.For Petitioners : Mr.M.GnanasekarFor R1 and R2 : Mrs.M.Sneha Special Counsel, Health DepartmentFor R3 and R4 : Mr.P.Anand Kumar Government Advocate*******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for having willfully disobeyed the directions of this Court dated 09.07.2024 in Rev. Application No.40 of 2024 in W.A.No.1606 of 2014.

2.

Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘for reporting compliance’. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3950 of 20243. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, Mrs.M.Sneha, learned Special Counsel, Health Department, appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the order of this Court has been duly complied with. Out of 93 persons (petitioners in R.A.No.40 of 2024), 90 persons appeared for certificate verification and were appointed. Out of the remaining 3 persons, one person did not come for certificate verification and two persons have lost their certificates. 4. Since the order of this Court has been duly complied with, this Contempt Petition is closed.[PVJ] [MJRJ]06.01.2026 ksa-2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3950 of 2024P.VELMURUGAN, JandM.JOTHIRAMAN, Jksa-2Cont.P.No.3950 of 202406.01.2026

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments