✦ Madras High Court

G.Baskaran v. Arul Jothi,The Tahsildar,Madhavaram

C V KARTHIKEYAN, ANDK RAJASEKAR

Case at a glance

Bench
C V KARTHIKEYAN, ANDK RAJASEKAR

Provisions considered

Judgment

CONT P No. 2039 of 2025__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYANANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKARCONT P No. 2039 of 2025G.Baskaran..Petitioner(s)VsArul Jothi, The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk, Madhavaram, Chennai - 600 060...Respondent(s)This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1971, to punish the respondent for contempt of Court for disobeying the order passed in W.P.No. 34015 of 2024 dated 19.11.2024.For Petitioner(s):Mr. P.PrabuFor Respondent(s):Mr. D.Ravichander, SGP.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.)The respondent had filed a memo and paragraph No.2 in the same is extracted below: https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2039 of 2025__________Page2 of 4

2. The respondent respectfully submits that in compliance with the orders of this Hon’ble Court, the respondent had issued notice on 05.03.2026 to the petitioner as well as the encroacher directing them to appear for enquiry in compliance with the orders of this Hon’ble Court, the notice of enquiry is enclosed with this memo.

2. In view of the fact that notice for enquiry had been issued, this Contempt Petition stands closed with liberty to open the same, if required. The enquiry to be concluded within a period of three weeks from today this order is uploaded. (C.V.K.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 09-03-2026smvIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2039 of 2025__________Page3 of 4ToArul Jothi, The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk, Madhavaram, Chennai - 600 060. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2039 of 2025__________Page4 of 4C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.smvCONT P No. 2039 of 202509-03-2026

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments