Judgment · High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, this Court directs the Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai to dispose of the un-numbered applications in I.As in A.R.C. No.170 of 2024 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Since…
Judgment
CRP No. 3344 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSECRP Nos. 3344 & 3346 of 2026D.MadhuriPetitioner(s)Vs1. DNC Chits Private LimitedRep. by Senior Coordinator, Authorised Signatory No.14/49, Dr.B.Narasimman Road, North Boag Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017.
B.Pricilla Britto3.J.Britto Vethanayagam4.J.Suresh PaulRespondent(s)CRP No. 3346 of 20261. J.Suresh PaulPetitioner(s)Vs1. DNC Chits Private LimitedRep. by Senior Coordinator, Authorised Signatory M.V.S.R.Prasad, No.14/49, Dr.B.Narasimman Road, North Boag Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017.2.B.Pricilla Britto3.J.Britto Vethanayagam4.D.MadhuriRespondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3344 of 2026CRP No. 3344 of 2026PRAYERTo direct the Learned Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai, to consider and dispose the unnumbered application filed by the Petitioner under Rule 51 of Chit Fund Rules to lift the order of attachment dated 13.02.2025 against the property comprised in Survey No.166/12 admeasuring to an extent of 2400 sq.ft located in Poombukar Nagar, Kolathur village by fixing a time frame.CRP No. 3346 of 2026PRAYERTo direct the learned Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai to consider and dispose the unnumbered Application filed by the Petitioner under Rule 51 of Chit Fund Rules to lift the order of attachment dated 13.02.2025 against the property comprised in Plot No.13, 14, 15 located at Thirumalai Nagar, Morai Village admeasuring to an extent of 1694 sq.ft. by fixing a time frame. For Petitioners: Mr.Vijayan for Mr.R.KarthikeyanORDERThese Civil Revision Petitions have been filed seeking for a limited relief. 2. The petitioners seek for an early disposal of the unnumbered I.As. in A.R.C. No.170 of 2024.
The petitioners have filed applications before the Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai under Rule 51 of Chit Fund Rules to lift the order of attachment dated 13.02.2025 against the properties, more fully disclosed in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3344 of 2026prayer to these Civil Revision Petitions. The petitioners claim that their properties have been wrongfully attached. Hence, they seek for lifting the order of attachment.
No prejudice will be caused to any of the parties if a direction is issued to the Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai to dispose of the un-numbered applications in I.As. in A.R.C. No.170 of 2024 pending on the file of the Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai to lift the order of attachment dated 13.02.2025 as against the properties, more fully disclosed in these petitions, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
Operative part
Accordingly, this Court directs the Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai to dispose of the un-numbered applications in I.As in A.R.C. No.170 of 2024 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondent, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 7. With the above direction, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of. No costs.18-06-2026VgaTo1.The Arbitrator of Chits, North and South Chennai. 2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3344 of 2026ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.vgaCRP Nos. 3344 & 3346 of 202618-06-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, these Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 13 Feb 2025. The bench was ABDUL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.