Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
2024, this appeal filed by the Revenue, stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Income Tax Act, 1961 s. 271(1)(c)
Judgment
Operative part
TCA No. 56 of 2010__________Page1 of 3IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-04-2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRANANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMEDTCA No. 56 of 2010---Commissioner Of Income Tax-III, Chennai .. AppellantVs.M/s Sriram Chits Tamil Nadu P Ltd.,“Greams Dugar” 4th and 5th Floors, No.149 Greams Road, Chennai-600 006… RespondentTax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-” D” Bench, dated 26.06.2009 in I.A.No.2116/Mds/2008, Assessment Year 2002-03.For Appellant(s):Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, Senior Standing CounselFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.SivaramanJUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.G.Jayachandran, J.)This appeal is filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming the deletion of the penalty https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA No. 56 of 2010__________Page2 of 3under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, at Rs.53,39,599/- by the assessing officer.2. Since the disputed tax is below Rs.2 crores covered under the low tax liability, in the light of the CBDT Circular No.9 of 2024, dated 17.09.2024, this appeal filed by the Revenue, stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (G.J.,J.) (S.S.A.,J.) 22-04-2026csToThe Commissioner Of Income Tax-III, Chennai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TCA No. 56 of 2010__________Page3 of 3Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, Jand SHAMIM AHMED, JcsTCA No. 56 of 2010 22-04-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 2024, this appeal filed by the Revenue, stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Income Tax Act, 1961 — s. 271(1)(c).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.