✦ Uttarakhand High Court · 16 Oct 1998

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Circle, Dehradun

Income Tax Appeal No. 230 of 2001C S RAWAT

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. An identical question of law was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut and another Vs. ONGC as agent of Cooper Engineering Services International Incorporated and connected cases, which was reported in (2003) 264…

Judgment

ONGC, Tel Bhawan, Dehradun as representative of Mr. Ivan Vorobie. ….Respondent Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent. Coram: Hon. Cyriac Joseph, C.J. Hon. J.C.S. Rawat, J. JUDGMENT CYRIAC JOSEPH, C.J.(Oral)

1.

This appeal is against the order dated 16th October 1998 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench “B” in ITA. No. 3513(D) of 1992. The dispute relates to the Assessment Year 1990-91. The assessee is Mr. Ivan Vorobie, represented by ONGC., Tel Bhawan, Dehradun.

2.

The substantial question of law raised in the appeal is as follows:

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing to apply Single Stage Grossing up of the Tax perquisites paid by ONGC on behalf of the assessee, instead of Multi Stage Grossing Up, applied by the Assessing Officer under section 195- A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

3.

An identical question of law was considered by a Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut and another Vs. ONGC as agent of Cooper Engineering Services International Incorporated and connected cases, which was reported in (2003) 264 ITR 340. In the above judgment, this Court held that the Tribunal was right in holding that Multiple Stage Grossing Up of income was not applicable to notional income under section 44BB read with section 195A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

4.

Following the above mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, we dismiss this appeal. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 06.09.2005 (Cyriac Joseph, C.J.) 06.09.2005 A

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Income Tax Act, 1961 — ss. 44BB, 195A.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Uttarakhand High Court, on 16 Oct 1998. The bench was C S RAWAT.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Income Tax Appeal No. 230 of 2001). ← Search more judgments