✦ Uttarakhand High Court · 29 May 2004

Assessment Year 1990-91 v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut

I.T.A No. 355 of 2001RAJESH TANDON

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Appeal is disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

O.N.G.C., Dehradun As representative of Mr. Jaden Victor ………. Respondent Mr. S.K. Posti, learned Advocate for Income Tax Department. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for respondent. Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. The matter is squarely covered by our decision dated 30th September, 2003 in Income Tax Appeal No. 470 of 2001; The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut & another Vs O.N.G.C., Dehradun. The question raised before us is as follows:

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing to apply single stage grossing up of the Tax perquisites paid by ONGC on behalf of the assessee instead of multi stage grossing up, applied by the Assessing Officer under section 195-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

For the reasons recorded in the above judgment in Income Tax Appeal No. 470 of 2001 dated 30th September, 2003, we answer this question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the Department. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) Dt. 29.05.2004 G

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Income Tax Act, 1961.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Uttarakhand High Court, on 29 May 2004. The bench was RAJESH TANDON.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. I.T.A No. 355 of 2001). ← Search more judgments