Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 888/2009 (Smt. Sharda wd/o Jayant Shirsat Vs. The Div. Jt. Registrar, Coop. Societies & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Court's or Judge's orders Mr. K.S. Narwade, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.M. Kale, A.G.P. For respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JUNE 10 . , 2009 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the respondent no.4 has passed the final order in enquiry under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, seeks liberty to raise all the grounds raised in the writ petition, in an appeal which is preferred against the order passed by the respondent no.4. The request made on behalf of the petitioner is granted. All points raised in this writ petition, are kept open. RMP The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — s. 88.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.