✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Nov 2025

SUBHASH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Anr.

Writ Petition No. 1820 of 2018SUSHIL M GHODESWAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as abated

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as abated. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1820 OF 2018 SUBHASH S/O. JUGALKISHOR JAISWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ….. Mr Quadri Syed Raheel, Advocate h/f Mrs Fatema Kazi, Advocate for Petitioner Mr V. M. Lomte, APP for Respondent No.1/State ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 25th NOVEMBER 2025 P. C. :

1.

Mr Quadri, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mrs Kazi for the petitioner, upon instructions, submits that the petitioner is reported to be dead and therefore the instant petition has abated against him.

Operative part

2.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as abated.

[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.]

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as abated

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 25 Nov 2025. The bench was SUSHIL M GHODESWAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1820 of 2018). ← Search more judgments