O. NARENDRA TRIVEDI..Ms. Akanksha & Anr. v. Sagar
Judgment
*1* 915crwp443o19IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABADCRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2020BHARAT S/O. SHANTILAL DHARIWALVERSUSASHA W/O. NARENDRA TRIVEDI AND ANR...Ms. Akanksha V. Sagar, Advocate h/f Shri Paranjape Prakash S.,Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri V.M. Lomte, APP for the Respondents/State.... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 04 December 2025P. C. :-
Learned advocate for the petitioner states that in thepassage of time, the proceedings from which the impugned orderarises and which are pending before the Trial Court, have beendisposed of and, therefore, the instant petition has becomeinfructuous.
In view of the above statement, the Writ Petition isdisposed of as infructuous. kps
( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.