✦ Bombay High Court · 27 Nov 2024

Aurangabad v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 12889 of 2024S G MEHARE, SHAILESH P BRAHME

Case at a glance

Order date
27 Nov 2024
Bench
S G MEHARE, SHAILESH P BRAHME
Neutral citation
2024:BHC-AUG:27892-DB

Judgment

Cause title

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 12889 OF 2024

Shri Bhaskaracharya Pratishthan Aurangabad through its President Gopichand Hanumantrao Chate .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

Shri Pramod D. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

Shri S. R. Dheple, Advocate for the Respondent No. 6.

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2024. FINAL

ORDER :

. It is a matter of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioner-management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. The learned A. G. P. waives service of notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and learned counsel Mr. Dheple, waives service of notice for respondent no. 6.

4.

We have heard both sides.

5.

We dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents 2 wp 12889.24 to undertake scrutiny of petitioner’s proposal independently on its merit and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within four (04) weeks from today and if it is found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse it within four (04) weeks thereafter. [SHAILESH P. BRAHME J.] [S. G. MEHARE, J.] bsb/Nov. 24

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 27 Nov 2024. The bench was S G MEHARE, SHAILESH P BRAHME.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 12889 of 2024). ← Search more judgments