✦ Bombay High Court · 02 Apr 2025

PANDHARI PRATISHTHAN BRAMHANI v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 4521 of 2025Y G KHOBRAGADE, MANGESH S PATIL

Case at a glance

Order date
02 Apr 2025
Bench
Y G KHOBRAGADE, MANGESH S PATIL
Neutral citation
2025:BHC-AUG:9822-DB

Judgment

• Mr. Pokale Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao, Advocate for the Petitioners • Mr. Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No. 1- UOI • Ms. V. N. Patil Jadhav, AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 – State • Mr. S. B. Parnere, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 – ZP … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 02.04.2025 PER COURT : . It is a matter of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioners - managements under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned advocate Mr. Kulkarni waives service for respondent No. 1. Learned AGP waives service for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Learned advocate Mr. Parnere waives service for respondent No. 5.

3.

We have heard both the sides. 966 WP NO. 4521 OF 2025

4.

We dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of each of petitioners’ proposals independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of four (04) weeks from today and if they are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to them within a period of four weeks thereafter. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) jhs/

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 02 Apr 2025. The bench was Y G KHOBRAGADE, MANGESH S PATIL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4521 of 2025). ← Search more judgments