VIJAYA FOUNDATION AURANGABAD SANCHALIT SCHOOL v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 05 Mar 2025
- Bench
- PRAFULLA S KHUBALKAR, MANGESH S PATIL
- Neutral citation
- 2025:BHC-AUG:6398-DB
Provisions considered
Judgment
VIJAYA FOUNDATION AURANGABAD SANCHALIT SCHOOL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pokale Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Addl. G.P. for respondents : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar Advocate for Respondent No.1: Mr. R.R. Bangar Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. S.R. Dheple … AND 905 WRIT PETITION NO.3128 OF 2025 KAI ANNASAHEB PATIL SEVABHAVI SANSTHA CHANDEGAON THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pokale Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao A.G.P. for respondents : Ms. S.S. Joshi Advocate for Respondent No.1: Mr. R.R. Bangar Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi AND 907 WRIT PETITION NO.3130 OF 2025 VISHWAKARMA BAHUUDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pokale Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao A.G.P. for respondents : Mr. S.V. Hange Advocate for Respondent No.1: Mr. Patale Amol N. Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. S.R. Dheple AND 909 WRIT PETITION NO.3132 OF 2025 VATSALYA BAHUUDDESHIYA MANAV VIKAS PRATISHTHAN THR ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHES VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 902,905,907,909.WP.3105.25.odt ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pokale Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao A.G.P. for respondent/State : Mr. A.V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent No.1: Mr. R.R. Bangar Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. S.B. Parnere … CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE :
05.03.2025 PER COURT: These are the matters of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioners-managements under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Issue notice to the respondents. Learned A.G.Ps. waive service for respondents/State.
We have heard both the sides. We dispose of the writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of each of petitioners' proposals independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four (04) weeks from today and if they are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to them within a period of four weeks thereafter. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb/
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 05 Mar 2025. The bench was PRAFULLA S KHUBALKAR, MANGESH S PATIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.