SHEET No v. Municipal Corporation for City of Jalgaon)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. If such a representation is made, the respondent-Municipal Corporation shall consider the same in accordance with law. Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] Sd/-
Judgment
Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh, Advocate h/f. Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. P.R. Patil, Advocate for the respondent no.1 Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for respondent no.2 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 29.09.2011 P.C.:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the Petition and seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition, with a liberty to make a comprehensive representation to the Municipal Corporation, with all the relevant material, to establish that in view of sub-section (2) of section 124-A of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966, there was already a development permission prior to 10.8.1992. 2 WP 10616.2010
The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. If such a representation is made, the respondent-Municipal Corporation shall consider the same in accordance with law. Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] Sd/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.