Meena Krushna Nagave v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to renew the prayers made in this Petition, at the subsequent stage, if need arises. [ SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1685 OF 2024 Meena Krushna Nagave PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS Mr. Balbhim R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, APP for Respondent - State ....… ....... [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 8 th OCTOBER, 2025 ORDER :
#1. In view of subsequent developments and filing of NC summary report by the Investigating OfÏcer, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Petition and liberty to contest the matter before the Trial Court, opposing the summary report.
#2. Permission is granted.
#3. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to renew the prayers made in this Petition, at the subsequent stage, if need arises. [ SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.